When Founders Speak: A Call for a Growth Mindset in UK SME Policy

What a LinkedIn post from Ollie Austen reveals about Britain’s startup landscape, the barriers to economic growth, and the grassroots vision for founder-first reform.

Introduction:

“Could the UK Government adopt a growth mindset?”

With that question, entrepreneur Ollie Austen cracked open a much larger conversation than it may seem at first glance. In a post summarizing insights from a recent Startup 2 Standup session hosted by Andrew Grimshaw, Austen issued a compelling challenge to UK policymakers: if the country is serious about economic recovery and global competitiveness, then founders and SMEs must no longer be sidelined in policymaking.

The post struck a nerve, drawing dozens of voices into the comments and reminding the LinkedIn community of something far deeper than a policy wish list: it exposed the emotional and institutional weight of Britain’s stagnating innovation economy—and pointed to what it might take to truly change course.

Background & Context:

Ollie Austen is no stranger to UK entrepreneurship. As the Co-Founder of Startup 2 Standup and a multiple exited founder, his experience bridges both the practitioner and ecosystem-building realms. Startup 2 Standup, known for candid conversations and community-driven sessions, regularly brings together founders, policymakers, and experts to address UK startup barriers and brainstorm actionable solutions.

The timing of this particular session was critical. With economic growth teetering, an election looming, and UK business confidence shaken by international isolation, rising inflation, and post-Brexit uncertainty, the country is grappling with how to reposition itself as a global hub of innovation.

This is the backdrop against which Austen’s post delivered its quiet, yet potent provocation.

Main Takeaways / Observations:

1. The Founder Frustration Is Structural, Not Superficial The Startup 2 Standup session unearthed what many founders across the UK already know: the system isn’t designed with them in mind.

• There is no national platform to connect startups to corporations, investors, and government contracts. The call for a UK Business Connect Platform—described as “LinkedIn with a government backend”—underscored how fragmented the landscape remains.
• Structural barriers like opaque procurement, funding inaccessibility, and outdated bureaucracy add layers of friction for those trying to innovate from scratch.

Austen noted that connecting a founder with IP at BP or Shell could unlock game-changing solutions—if only the system were built to facilitate it. Instead, many founders are left operating in silos, navigating red tape, and competing on an uneven field.

2. Entrepreneurship Still Isn’t an Educational Priority Another takeaway: the transition from employment to entrepreneurship remains culturally and educationally unsupported.

• Attendees called for a founder-focused education pathway and tax systems that promote entrepreneurial transitions rather than punish them.
• There were demands for programs that recognize the skills and risks founders assume and that promote growth, not just compliance.

In a political climate where job security is prioritized over risk-taking, the UK still lacks a policy narrative that encourages entrepreneurial identity as a viable and desirable option.

3. Founders Need a Seat at the Policy Table The most consistent theme? Accountability.

Participants argued that any government serious about hitting growth targets must stop treating founders as footnotes. They need representation in regulatory consultations, access to procurement opportunities, and support from public innovation funds.

Austen summed up the sentiment: “It’s time to amplify our voices and drive positive change for founders and growth prospects.”

Community Reaction:

The post generated strong, thoughtful reactions:

• Wesley Baker lauded the urgency, writing, “I completely agree that we need urgent and bold action to drive real UK growth,” and warned against the rise of isolationist sentiment that could further damage investor confidence.
• Deepak Kr. Kaushik highlighted the psychological edge of the discussion, praising the embrace of the “growth mindset” metaphor.
• Phil McSweeney offered a more critical note, stating that despite government majorities, the UK “seems to lack the confidence or will to do anything constructive for small businesses.”
• Rachel Murphy added a biting observation: “Staggered that the most progressive voice for business we are hearing in UK politics right now is Nigel Farage.”

Collectively, these responses tell a story: founders are not just disillusioned; they’re determined to be heard.

Our Perspective / Analysis:

From a business and legal lens, the conversation reflects deeper systemic gaps that require contractual, financial, and legislative reform.

• Procurement reform is a top priority. Founders are often locked out of lucrative government contracts due to complex eligibility criteria and rigid onboarding systems. Opening procurement through founder-first qualification rules could stimulate a new wave of public-private innovation.
• Tax restructuring to support founder transitions from employment (PAYE) to entrepreneurship could reduce early-stage financial risk. This might include deferred tax programs, innovation credits, or founder relief funds.
• Legal frameworks that prioritize founder IP protection, streamline corporate formation, and recognize non-traditional equity structures would also help modernize the UK startup economy.

In short, the solutions already exist. What’s missing is the political will to activate them.

Call to Reflection or Action (Closing):

If the UK wants to compete globally in the coming decades, its economic story must be told through the eyes of its risk-takers.

And right now, those risk-takers are asking a simple question: “Can we finally stop optimizing for bureaucracy and start optimizing for builders?”

If you’re a policymaker, how are you embedding founder voices into your growth strategy?

If you’re a founder, how are you shaping the conversation, not just surviving the outcome?

If you’re a citizen, are you voting for the kind of economy that supports people like the ones behind Startup 2 Standup?

The mindset shift is overdue. But as Austen’s post shows, the voices are already rising. What comes next depends on whether anyone listens.

 

 

 

 

 

Click here to visit LinkedIn Post